As a nit-reg, I always hated things like the Bad Beat Jackpot. I guess it seemed like it was just flushing money down the drain. The players contribute 100% and the casino takes 10% of the BBJ, so this *has* to be -ev for the players AS A WHOLE.
This is the first time I've really played predominantly on BBJ tables so I thought I would get more details on it. I sent Carbon an email asking how much I paid last month into the BBJ. They replied $1,315 (after 9 days). Yes - contrary to popular opinion, Carbon *does* have a support staff. Umm... I paid $2,921 in rake, and I paid 45% more into the BBJ?!? Apparently $0.50 from every flopped pot is added to the BBJ, regardless of size! Last month, my winnings were only $3,999, which was a win rate of 2.43BB. The rake I paid is 1.76BB (of which I got about half back), and my BBJ contribution was 0.80BB (of which I got nada). That's a huge chunk of my win rate that's rake and BBJ.
I hadn't really paid attention to the little details on my play on the small stakes tables before. I mean I paid 2.73BB in rake at 0.5/1! What the hell?!? (later post) But I digress...
I guess I should have asked for my BBJ contribution by stake, but I don't feel like waiting another 9 days to get the reply. Because it's all irrelevant to me. At the end of the day, it's all about the bottom line. And the bottom line is...
I know this sounds like the BBJ structure at Merge sucks, but in a future post, I'll show you why playing on BBJ tables is +ev. That's right! It's POSITIVE EV!




No comments:
Post a Comment